On “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan” this week:
- Reaccessiblean Sen. JD Vance of Ohio
- Kansas Gov. Laura Kelly
- Ret. Gen. Frank McKenzie, establisher directer for U.S. Central Command
- Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan
Click here to browse filled transcripts of “Face the Nation.”
MARGARET BRENNAN: I’m Margaret Brennan in Washington.
And this week on Face the Nation: Overnight, there are novel tells of foreign meddlence in the 2024 election. This time, the aim is establisher Plivent Trump’s campaign. And we go in-depth with Trump’s running mate, Ohio Senator J.D. Vance.
Vice Plivent Kamala Harris picked a coach for her running mate, Minnesota’s Governor Tim Walz. But, last night in Las Vegas, she lifted a campaign carry out from the Trump carry outbook and liftd him one.
(Begin VT)
KAMALA HARRIS (Vice Plivent of the United States (D) and U.S. Plivential Candidate): That we will carry on our fight for toiling families of America…
(CHEERING)
(APPLAUSE)
VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS: … including to lift the least wage…
(CHEERING)
(APPLAUSE)
VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS: … and rerelocate taxes on tips for service and hospitality toilers.
(CHEERING)
(APPLAUSE)
(End VT)
MARGARET BRENNAN: That’s a proposal that will go over well in the battleground state of Nevada.
But can Democrats score in the heartland? We will talk with Kansas Democrat Governor Laura Kelly.
Plus: V.P. certain J.D. Vance has been on the dishonorful on the campaign trail.
(Begin VT)
SENATOR J.D. VANCE (R-Ohio) (Vice Plivential Candidate): Everyleang that Kamala Harris touches has been a catastrophe.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Plivent Trump has shelp you are remarkworthy, but when you watch at what determines elections, the vice plivential pick exceptionally matters. How are you going to show him wrong?
(LAUGHTER)
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Well, I leank Plivent Trump’s right about that, actuassociate.
(End VT)
MARGARET BRENNAN: We will talk with him about campaign policy and how GOP proposals will impact Americans.
We will examine in on two other big stories, the state of the economy with Bank of America CEO, Brian Moynihan. And reweary General Frank McKenzie will give us an refresh on tensions in the Middle East.
It’s all fair ahead on Face the Nation.
Good morning, and greet to Face the Nation.
Last night, establisher Plivent Trump shelp that his campaign had been inestablished that one of his top advisers was hacked by the Iranian administerment. We have got a lot more on that ahead, but we commence with our interwatch with Mr. Trump’s running mate J.D. Vance.
We sat down with him in Cincinnati Saturday morning, before the novels broke about the hack.
(Begin VT)
MARGARET BRENNAN: You helped the Supreme Court ruling recently on mifepristone, the – the so-called abortion pill, that ruled opponents deficiencyed the legitimate right to sue over the FDA approval.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE (R-Ohio) (Vice Plivential Candidate): That’s right.
MARGARET BRENNAN: This drug is engaged in enjoy 60 percent of all abortions in the United States. In a Trump/Vance administration, would you engage the FDA to block access to this drug?
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Well, no.
What the plivent has shelp very evidently is that abortion policy should be made by the states, right? You, of course, want to produce certain that any medicine is protected, that it’s prescribed in the right way, and so forth, but the plivent wants individual states to produce these decisions, becaengage, watch, Margaret, California is going to have a branch offent abortion policy from Ohio, which is going to have a branch offent abortion policy from Alabama.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Right, but that was actuassociate branch offent, becaengage, after Dobbs, the Supreme Court took up this case, right.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Yes, but – but, enjoy you shelp, on…
MARGARET BRENNAN: They watched it as branch offent.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Sure, but, enjoy you shelp, on a matter of legitimate standing.
But I leank that what we reassociate want is, when states and voters in those states produce decisions, we of course want the states and the federal administerment to admire those decisions, and that’s what Plivent Trump has shelp is, constantly, we necessitate to get out of the culture war side of the abortion publish.
We necessitate to let the states determine their definite abortion policy. And, watch, what Plivent Trump and I want to do on family policy is produce it easier for families to begin in the first place.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So, at his presser this past week, Donald Trump seemed to show he was discleave out to redisconnecteions on mifepristone.
He was asked by a teller about this, and he shelp: “There are many leangs on a humane basis that you can do, but also give a vote.”
So he did seem to be indicating he’s discleave out to redisconnecteions on this particular drug.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: First of all, even some of the tellers who were in the room at that press conference shelp it wasn’t evident what the teller was asking. Maybe he couldn’t hear that person super evidently.
So I don’t want to put words in Plivent Trump’s mouth. What he shelp very evidently in the talk about is that he consents with the Supreme Court decision, but, more presentantly, he wants these decisions to be made by the states.
MARGARET BRENNAN: You, personassociate, signed on as a senator to a letter to the DOJ insisting it shut down all mail-order abortion operations under the Comstock Act.
So, would you seek to apply that law branch offently?
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Well, what we shelp in that letter, Margaret, is that we want doctors to prescribe this stuff to determine that it’s protected. I uncomfervent, we do this with antibiotics. We do this with a lot of antidepressants.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, the FDA says it is.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: And we – we fair want the FDA to produce certain that doctors are prescribing this in a protected way. That’s all that we ever shelp, and I – I count on that that is how Plivent Trump experiences about this is, aobtain, you want the states to produce these determinations.
You also want to produce certain the FDA is ensuring that these medications are protected for anybody who’s taking them.
MARGARET BRENNAN: It’s been on the taget for decades, and the FDA does say it is protected, but would – where a doctor…
(CROSSTALK)
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Well, antibiotic – Margaret, antibiotics are protected, but we want to produce certain they’re prescribed by doctors, and the doctors are properly watching this stuff so that people don’t get hurt.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure, of course. But…
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: And, Margaret, we’ve – we’ve talked now, I leank, for six asks about abortion.
MARGARET BRENNAN: I’m still trying to get a evident answer.
So, for an FDA…
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: And I gave you one.
MARGARET BRENNAN: … comleave outioner…
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Sure.
MARGARET BRENNAN: … that you would be part of choosing, where that Comleave outioner stands on this drug, would that resettle whether or not they are chosen to be put in this key role?
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: I leank Plivent Trump has evidently shelp there are no litmus tests on this particular publish.
He fair wants to produce certain that substances are protected and effective before they’re out there in the taget, and, of course, that doctors are properly deal withling this stuff, so that people don’t get hurt. And, aobtain, Margaret, I uncomfervent, we talk about abortion. I leank Plivent Trump’s watchs on abortion are excessively evident.
MARGARET BRENNAN: You’ve been talking about the trouble about the low birth rate in the United States of America, which is well-write downed.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Yes.
MARGARET BRENNAN: You shelp people without children should pay higher tax rates than those who have children, and the U.S. should watch at decreaseing income tax rates on women who have multiple children. And you pointed to Hungary as a model for that.
How do you schedule to carry out that policy?
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Well, it’s called the child tax praise, and we should enbig the child tax praise.
If you leank about what the child tax praise does…
MARGARET BRENNAN: So, you and the Biden administration consent on the childattfinish tax praise?
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Well, we leank it should be bigger. I leank Plivent Trump and I count on in an enbiged child tax praise.
But we also, presentantly, want to actuassociate get this leang done.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Mm-hmm.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: The child tax praise has languished thanks to the Biden administration, becaengage Harris has fall shorted to show fundamental directership. Chuck Schumer has been unable to get it thraw the United States Senate, and we want to have a more pro-family policy.
Now, you asked about…
(CROSSTALK)
MARGARET BRENNAN: There was fair a vote on this. You comprehend that.
And you weren’t there.
(CROSSTALK)
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: But, Margaret…
MARGARET BRENNAN: It was a messaging bill. I will give you that.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: It was a show vote.
MARGARET BRENNAN: I’m – I’m with you on that. But…
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: And if I had been there, it would have fall shorted. And I was – and I was…
MARGARET BRENNAN: So tell me definiteassociate what you want to do to enbig the childattfinish tax praise, becaengage it’s enjoy two magnificent per kid right now.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Well, I leank one of the leangs you can do is produce it bigger per child. I leank we’d cherish to see it at a higher dollar cherish –
MARGARET BRENNAN: Do you have a number in mind?
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: I uncomfervent, watch, I would cherish to see a child tax praise that’s $5,000 per child. But you, of course, have to toil with Congress to see how possible and viable that is.
We’ve also presentd legislation, Margaret, to finish this rehearse of parents getting these surpascfinish medical bills where they go to the hospital, they have a baby, they chose an out-of-nettoil provider, and they come home with unawaited bills. I have actuassociate backed legislation to finish that rehearse.
So we have a whole present of pro-family policies that are out there. And – and, aobtain, on the Harris administration, I have to push back aobtainst someleang a little bit, Margaret, becaengage when these comments where I shelp parents should pay decrease taxes via the child tax praise came out, the Harris administration promptly jumped and shelp, we disconsent with this.
The Harris campaign shelp, we disconsent with this. So do they want the elimination of the child tax praise? Or were they fair being negligent in reacting to retags that I made three years ago? I don’t comprehend.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Mm-hmm.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: They should elucidate it, maybe in an interwatch with you. But, of course, Kamala Harris refuses to do interwatchs with anybody.
MARGARET BRENNAN: We hope to have on and ask her about that.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Me too.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So, the childattfinish tax praise, you shelp $5,000 per child is what you’d enjoy to get to. Where would that start in?
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: I would enjoy to have a wide-based family policy and a wide-based child tax praise, Margaret.
Aobtain, we’ve talked about doing this for a lengthy time. Plivent Trump has been on the write down for a lengthy time helping a bigger child tax praise.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Mm-hmm.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: And I leank you want it to apply to all American families. I don’t leank that you want this – this – this massive cutoff for decrease-income families, which you have right now. You don’t want a branch offent policy for higher-income families.
You fair want to have a pro-family child tax praise.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So you have personassociate resistd universal childattfinish. How do you settle the childattfinish crisis in America?
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Well, what I have resistd is one model of childattfinish.
We, of course, want to give everybody access to childattfinish. But, watch, in my family, I grew up in a necessitatey family where the childattfinish was my magnificentparents.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Right.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: And a lot of these childattfinish proposals do noleang for magnificentparents. If you watch at some of these proposals, they do noleang for stay-at-home moms or stay-at-home dads.
I want us to have a childattfinish policy that’s excellent for all families, not fair a particular model of family, and that’s what I have shelp.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So what do you uncomfervent by that? There would be enjoy a praise per kid if it’s a stay-at-home mom, a praise per kid if it’s magnificentma?
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Yes, exactly.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Like they would get a examine to get attfinish of their…
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: No, that – that – that – that’s exactly what I present.
I’m fair saying that I don’t want us to like one family model over another. If you’ve got magnificentparents who are at home taking attfinish of the kids, I leank they deserve to be treated the same as – the same way as other family models by their administerment.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Gay families, they’d be engaged? All families?
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: All families would be engaged, of course.
MARGARET BRENNAN: OK.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: All families would be engaged.
MARGARET BRENNAN: What about reassociate youthful kids? Should 3- and 4-year-elderly kids have access to preschool?
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Well, watch, I leank that certainly some families are going to pick that, but aobtain, some families are going to pick magnificentparents and so forth. I leank our watch…
MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, that’s childattfinish. That’s branch offent than a preschool.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Well, our – our watch – well, very frequently preschool is childattfinish. It’s at least a establish of childattfinish. I comprehend that, when I went to preschool…
MARGARET BRENNAN: Your kids went to preschool.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Yes, and we engage it as childattfinish, right? You’re hoping your kids get a excellent education, but you’re also doing it becaengage you want to provide childattfinish for your kids. I don’t leank there’s anyleang incongruous or inconstant about that.
And I leank, watch, we count on that we want to produce it easier for American families, Margaret, to produce their own choices on this stuff. We talk about school choice, of course, school choice would apply to all families, it would apply to all parents, and we would fair want parents to have choices. And I leank…
MARGARET BRENNAN: Including for preschool, becaengage, in many accessible school systems, there is no preschool. That’s why I’m asking.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: I leank that we want parents to have choices, Margaret. Like I fair shelp, we want them to be able to produce the choices that produce the most sense for their family. For some, it’s going to be preschool. For some, it’s going to be day attfinish. For some, it’s going to be having the kids stay at home a little bit lengthyer.
We fair want the administerment to treat everybody equassociate, considerless of wantipathyver education or family model you have.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So, you have a very youthful family.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: I do.
MARGARET BRENNAN: You have a very accomplished wife, Usha, who she went to…
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: I’m very self-presentant of her.
MARGARET BRENNAN: … yes, Yale, Cambridge. She clerked at the Supreme Court. We heard her on stage at the RNC.
You gave a recent interwatch to Megyn Kelly.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Yes.
MARGARET BRENNAN: And you spoke about white supremacists aggressioning your family…
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Sure.
MARGARET BRENNAN: … becaengage she’s not a white person.
How troubleed are you that this charitable of antipathy would comply you to the White Hoengage?
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Well, watch, it’s going to comply us wherever we go, becaengage that’s the nature of accessible life in America, and it’s discultured.
Look, I cherish my wife. I’m very self-presentant of her. I’m excessively fortunate to have met her and to have gotten the chance to produce a life with her. And my attitude on this is, people want to aggression me, aggression my policy watchs, they’re greet to. I signed up for it. My wife didn’t sign up for it.
And, by the way, she’s out of the – she’s way out of their league, the people who are aggressioning her. So I want they would fair grasp their mouths shut, or at least intensify on me. But, watch, it’s the nature of accessible life in this country. My wife’s pretty hard, and she comprehends what we signed up for.
MARGARET BRENNAN: I envision it’s difficult to grasp your temper when you hear leangs enjoy that.
(LAUGHTER)
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Yes, I get pissed off sometimes, certainly…
MARGARET BRENNAN: Yes.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: …when people aggression your family, and certainly aggression your family for someleang that no person can deal with.
And I do leank that there’s been this leang in America…
MARGARET BRENNAN: Mm-hmm.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: … where we’ve shelp that we should appraise people based on their skin color, based on their immutable characteristics, based on leangs that they can’t deal with.
I, frankly, leank that, unblessedly, a lot of people on the left have leaned into this by trying to sort people by skin color and then give exceptional profits or exceptional amounts of bias. The Harris administration, for example, handed out farm profits to people based on skin color. I leank that’s discultured.
I don’t – I don’t leank we should say, you get farm profits if you’re a bdeficiency farmer, you don’t get farm profits if you’re a white farmer. All farmers, we want to thrive, and that’s certainly the Plivent Trump and J.D. Vance watch of the situation.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Mm-hmm.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: But I do leank, unblessedly, when our directers split us by race, you’re going to have antipathy on the left side of the political spectrum. You’re going to have antipathy on the right side of the political spectrum.
We should fair appraise people based on individual characteristics and based on merit, and that’s certainly what Plivent Trump and I want to do.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Yes. But that wasn’t born in the last four years, I uncomfervent, one of the…
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: No, no, not at all, but I leank that Plivent Biden and Harris have certainly quickend it.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Yes.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: I don’t leank you’ve seen any – anyleang enjoy what we’ve seen from Kamala Harris when it comes to handing out administerment profits based on people’s immutable characteristics.
The actual legitimate enshrinement of bias in this country, we haven’t seen anyleang enjoy it in the last 30 or 40 years. Certainly, back in the ’60s and ’50s, we all watch at that as a period that we wanted to get away from, and, in some ways, the Harris administration has recarry outed it.
I leank it’s pretty discultured.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, in your own relocatement – that’s what I want to ask about, becaengage one of the supremacists who was saying leangs enjoy this about your family…
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Yes.
MARGARET BRENNAN: … Nick Fuentes, an avowed antisdisindicte…
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Sure.
MARGARET BRENNAN: … went after your wife. He had previously dined at Mar-a-Lago with Donald Trump.
Does this have any room in your relocatement, in the MAGA relocatement?
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Of course it doesn’t have any room in the MAGA relocatement. And, of course…
MARGARET BRENNAN: Would you disavow him and – and this?
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: And, of course – and, of course, Donald Trump has condemnd this person.
Look, I leank the guy’s a total leave outr. Certainly, I disavow him. But if you ask me what I attfinish more about, is it a person aggressioning me personassociate, or is it administerment policy that discriminates based on race, that’s what I reassociate stress about.
MARGARET BRENNAN: We’re going to tag this year the three-year anniversary of the U.S. – the finish of the U.S. war in Afghanistan.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Yes.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Plivent Trump barobtaind that disengageal.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Sure.
MARGARET BRENNAN: The execution, you’ve been very critical of as very unrestful, under Plivent Biden.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Yes.
MARGARET BRENNAN: But let’s watch at what you could do if you’re in office.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Sure.
MARGARET BRENNAN: There are about 80,000 or so Afghans who were left behind, many of whom toiled for the United States. Does America owe them? Should you transport them here?
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Well, I leank that we should transport people here who helped us and have been properly vetted. And that’s very, very presentant, becaengage a lot of the people the Biden administration has brawt in have not been properly vetted. And I leank…
MARGARET BRENNAN: Are you talking about Afghan vets?
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: And I leank the most presentant – certainly, the Biden administration has let in Afghan nationals who say that they helped Americans, but actuassociate did not.
We also necessitate to reaccumulate, Margaret, there was a lot, when we were in Afghanistan, a lot of so-called blue-on-green, or green-on-blue presentility, where people who are allegedly supposed to help us finished American troops. Do I want them in our country? Of course I don’t. In fact, I want they weren’t on this Earth anymore. So we have to be pimpolitent about who we let into this country. But I leank the…
MARGARET BRENNAN: I’m talking about people who toiled alengthyside United States servicepeople…
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: And if they’re…
MARGARET BRENNAN: … on the ground in Afghanistan.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: And if they’re properly vetted, I leank that we should help them. Some of them don’t want to come here, by the way, Margaret. Some of them would enjoy us to give them protectedty in another country.
MARGARET BRENNAN: I ask you that becaengage Plivent Trump shelp a restrictcessitate days ago he’ll suspfinish refugee adleave outions to the United States…
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Exactly, becaengage we’re not properly…
MARGARET BRENNAN: But you’re saying not in this case?
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: No, absolutely, I’m saying in this case, Margaret, becaengage we’re not properly vetting the people that are being let in thraw these refugee programs.
What Plivent Trump shelp is very presentant. You cannot show up at an American consuprocrastinateed and say, I helped the Americans. Go let me into America becaengage I’m a refugee.
MARGARET BRENNAN: That’s not how the process toils. You comprehend that.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: It very frequently is how the process toils, Margaret.
MARGARET BRENNAN: It is not.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: The Biden administration has been talk aboutous in not properly vetting these people. Donald Trump is exactly right.
And, aobtain, fair becaengage they helped us, allegedly, doesn’t uncomfervent you have to let them come to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Maybe some of them should go to other countries. Maybe we should help some of them in their own country. And Plivent Trump is exactly right about this.
In fact, we comprehend, we comprehend beyond a shadow of ask that some of the people who have been let into this country are on the alarmist watch catalog. That is discultured. And Trump is right that we should stop it.
MARGARET BRENNAN: I leank now you’re conflating a restrictcessitate branch offent leangs. You are now talking about people who have come in thraw the southern border, versus people who were vetted and toiled with U.S. intelligence.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Oh, no, we – we – we’ve certainly let in people thraw refugee reresettlement who should not be in this country. Absolutely, we have. We have not properly vetted everybody who’s come in.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Do you have someleang that you’ve been informed on?
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Certainly, if you watch at…
MARGARET BRENNAN: A definite example you’re worried about?
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Well, I have been – I have been informed personally, but there’s also been accessible tells of people who have come in thraw the refugee reresettlement process who are actuassociate on some charitable of radicalism watch catalog who – or who, presentantly, were not actuassociate helping Americans, even though they claimed – we got to be pimpolitent, Margaret.
We have a country to protect, and we have – I uncomfervent, I have three youthful children. I don’t want people walking around the streets of this country who shelp they served the United States, but becaengage the Biden Administration doesn’t count on in immigration applyment, they didn’t properly vet them.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Do you watch China as a competitor or an adversary?
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: I leank they’re both, right?
And I leank that what we want to do here is produce the charitable of international order where we can examine China. We don’t want to go to war with China, but, certainly, they’re an adversary.
I uncomfervent, they comprehend – for example, the Chinese comprehend that they’re manufacturing tons of fentanyl they’re letting come – come into our country. Kamala Harris has done noleang about this. She should apply discreet and economic leverage over the Chinese to stop manufacturing this fentanyl, which then comes into the Mexican drug cartels, which they then ship into our country.
MARGARET BRENNAN: The United States has…
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: This – this – this – this is a…
MARGARET BRENNAN: The United States has summarizeated some of these groups…
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: This is a talk about.
MARGARET BRENNAN: … and pressed the Chinese administerment.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Oh, we could do so much more.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Fentanyl is not straightforward to manufacture, Margaret.
And if Harris was applying proper leverage to the Chinese and to the Mexican drug cartels, we would not have so many people dying of fentanyl drug poisonings.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Like, what? How – how do you do that? What’s your vision of do – how you do that?
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Well, I leank you walk into – to – to Beijing, you talk to Xi Jinping, and you say, your entire economy is going to collapse unless you get access to American tagets. You necessitate to get this fentanyl gravely or we are going to impose grave tariffs and economic penalties for not complying our laws and not helping us stem the flow of this lethal poison.
MARGARET BRENNAN: And you wouldn’t be worried about blowback on the U.S. economy?
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: I leank that we have a mighty economy, Margaret, with the best toilers in the entire world.
If we necessitate to fight a trade war with the Chinese, we will fight it and we will triumph it, but we cannot do what Kamala Harris has done, which is be so terrified of using the economic power that we have…
MARGARET BRENNAN: Mm-hmm.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: … that she’s not even willing to stop the flow of this lethal poison coming into our country.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Plivent Trump shelp Vlaunintelligentir Putin and Chinese Plivent Xi were cherishly individuals when he was speaking in Montana last night. You consent with that characterization?
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: I leank that Plivent Trump gets alengthy with world directers, and there’s noleang wrong with him praiseing them as people, if it produces him more effective discreetassociate. And there’s an irony here.
MARGARET BRENNAN: That’s branch offent than walking in and laying down the law to Xi Jinping.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: There’s an – oh, no, it’s not actuassociate, becaengage you’re better able to lay down the law, enjoy Plivent Trump did, if you actuassociate have a excellent relationship with people and they count on you to comply your word.
We have to reaccumulate that Democrats, including Kamala Harris, aggressioned Donald Trump for having a excellent relationship with Vlaunintelligentir Putin. Well, when Donald Trump was plivent, Vlaunintelligentir Putin didn’t occupy another country. When Kamala Harris was vice plivent, he did. So maybe they should get a lesson from Trump’s carry out – carry outbook about discreet legitimacy, becaengage I leank Donald Trump got a lot done becaengage world directers admireed him.
MARGARET BRENNAN: J.D. Vance, always excellent to talk to you.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Thanks, Margaret.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Thank you for making time for us.
SENATOR J.D. VANCE: Good to see you.
(End VT)
MARGARET BRENNAN: The filled interwatch is engageable on our YouTube channel and on our Web site.
We will be back in one minute, so stay with us.
(ANNOUNCEMENTS)
MARGARET BRENNAN: Yesterday, the Trump campaign shelp it was hacked and adviseed Iranian actors had stolen write downs.
E-mails obtained from that hack were telledly sent to Politico and “The Washington Post,” but both organizations deteriorated to unveil them. The claim came a day after Microgentle discleave outed that Iran and other foreign actors are interfering in the campaign.
We go now to CBS News intelligence and national security teller Olivia Gazis and CBS News cybersecurity expert and analyst Chris Krebs. He was also the head of CISA, the Cybersecurity and Infraarrange Security Agency, during the Trump administration.
So, Olivia, does U.S. intelligence appraise that this was indeed Iran?
OLIVIA GAZIS: So, far the U.S. intelligence community hasn’t shelp either way.
They have deferred instead to the Justice Department, as has the White Hoengage. They haven’t weighed in on this alleged hack. Microgentle, enjoyrational, is declining to comment beyond the exceptional tell that it already publishd this week, which didn’t expound which campaign was at publish.
Both of them, however, thus far have shelp leangs about Iranian activity that lfinishs credence to some of what the campaign has shelp. The intelligence community in its last refresh on election security in procrastinateed July showd that Iran was moving beyond being a disorder agent to dynamicly intervening in order to shape the outcome of the plivential race.
And while intelligence officials didn’t expound cltimely which campaign Iran was trying to denigrate, officials shelp that they were opposing the honestate that they count on would exacerbate tensions. So, it watchs right now enjoy it’s a reprisal of what happened in 2020, when U.S. intelligence finishd with high confidence that Iranian-connected actors had toiled to undermine Mr. Trump’s campaign at the honestion of the supreme directer.
I leank it’s worth noting that Microgentle’s analysis did connect the spearfishing try to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, the IRGC, which has a honest line…
MARGARET BRENNAN: Yes.
OLIVIA GAZIS: … to the supreme directer, and also notable that they weren’t evident on the intentions.
Iranians aim better political officials all of the time for intelligence-accumulateing purposes. Whether that was the purpose here, to accumulate intelligence, or to fuel an election meddlence campaign, or both, is still a ask.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Right.
CHRIS KREBS: Right.
MARGARET BRENNAN: And, Chris, you were in office in 2020 when Iran tried to interfere then.
CHRIS KREBS: That’s right.
MARGARET BRENNAN: How branch offence is – branch offent is this?
CHRIS KREBS: Well, that was a much more accessible effort.
So if you recall, in procrastinateed October, the Iranians sent a bunch of e-mails out to voters. They were able to accumulate e-mails thraw cyber intrusion into voter registration databases. And they dangerened them. They posed as the Proud Boys. They shelp: We’re going to come after you if you don’t sign up to vote as a Reaccessiblean and go out and vote for Plivent Trump.
Subsequent to that, they freed a video. Imarbitrately, the intelligence community was on top of it. There was a accessible press conference Wednesday evening with the honestor of national intelligence, the honestor of the FBI. I was there alengthyside the Department of Justice.
And that was a – a stark branch offence from 2016, when it took about eight, nine months to produce a accessible attribution.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Right.
CHRIS KREBS: This was done in the order of 36 hours or someleang to that effect.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Should we await that now?
CHRIS KREBS: I leank it – based on the intelligence community’s rapid declassification in carry on of the Russian aggression on Ukraine, it seems to be that that is the pattern for rapid declassification.
So I – I would not be surpascfinishd to see someleang soon.
MARGARET BRENNAN: We’re going to get a fracture and come back and finish this conversation on the other side of it, so stay with us.
(ANNOUNCEMENTS)
MARGARET BRENNAN: In our next half-hour, Kansas Governor Laura Kelly, Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan, and the procrastinateedst on the danger of aggression from Iran and Hezbollah on Israel.
(ANNOUNCEMENTS)
MARGARET BRENNAN: We return now to our conversation on cyber security with Olivia Gazis and Chris Krebs.
Chris, the Trump campaign is calling on tellers not to unveil anyleang they might get as a result of this alleged criminal behavior. The model I leank of is what happened in 2016 when the DNC was hacked and e-mails finished up hurting Hillary Clinton’s campaign. Is that what Iran is replicating now?
CHRIS KREBS: It certain seems so. If you go back and you watch at the Microgentle statement from Friday that talks about three prongs of an Iranian effort right now. One is to go after campaigns, another is this wideer disinestablishation effort to stoke the fires among society. And the third element is they went after a county election official. That is the exact duplicate – replication of the 2016 Russian carry outbook that was summarized in the 2017 intelligence community appraisement. So, what I leank we’re seeing is the russification of Iranian inestablishation operations.
Now, what is branch offent is who is receiving the inestablishation and what they do. So, what are – what is the – the – what is “Politico” doing? What is “The Washington Post” doing? They are shotriumphg some discretion right now. I leank that is an evolution in a response.
What will also be engaging to see in what social media platestablishs do. They do have a joincessitate track write down of – of apvalidateing some of this inestablishation to get out there. In other cases they have suppressed or getn it off-line. And that is yet to be seen what’s going to happen.
MARGARET BRENNAN: A hack and dump, and does this inestablishation show up somewhere.
CHRIS KREBS: This is a critical point here. This is hack and leak. This is mal inestablishation we’ve been telderly for over half a decade that cyber intrusion leak’s not a authentic leang. Now that, in this case, the shoe’s on the other foot, we are discovering that, yes, in fact, cyber intrusion leak is a authentic leang. We should await more of that.
Keep in mind, it is August. We have a lengthy way to go in this election. Iran definiteassociate seems to have carry ond their efforts, relocated them to the left perhaps a little bit. I wouldn’t be surpascfinishd to see Russia access the fray soon. I uncomfervent Microgentle talks about Russian disinestablishation efforts. A group that we track, Senolabs (ph), comprehendn as “Doppelganger,” they are dynamic. Others are going to be out there moving as well as the Chinese.
MARGARET BRENNAN: And, Olivia, we comprehend that national – the honestor of national intelligence has made evident it is Russia, it is also China, trying to have some shape here. What are they seeing in terms of pickred honestates? If Iran is trying to hurt Donald Trump, who are the others trying to help or hurt?
OLIVIA GAZIS: Right. There’s definitely an engaging vibrant this time around becaengage as much as the intensify today is on Iran, intelligence officials have actuassociate shelp that Russia carry ons to pose the preeminent danger in 2024. They are dynamic, they are aggressive, they are increasingly achieveing for tools that raise the efficacy and sophistication of the campaigns that they’re begining.
And as with the case in Iran, intelligence officials aren’t see-thharsh about whose campaign they’re interfere to undermine or raise, but shelp that their pickences haven’t alterd, which in 2016 and 2020 we comprehend that at Plivent Putin’s honestion there was a wide campaign led by Russian actors in order to denigrate the Democratic honestates and help Mr. Trump.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Yes.
OLIVIA GAZIS: What produces leangs engaging this year is, Iran and Russia being at traverse purposes, all while presentantening their strategic partnership in Ukraine, right?
MARGARET BRENNAN: That’s a fantastic point.
OLIVIA GAZIS: Exchanging leave outile and technologies there.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Yes.
OLIVIA GAZIS: But aobtain, they’re probably both encounterd for the byproduct of as much disinestablishation and discord it – sotriumphg as much of that as they can over the course of the election season.
MARGARET BRENNAN: And I comprehend we’re going to be talking about this unblessedly thraw the election, as you fair shelp, Chris Krebs.
CHRIS KREBS: And that – that is a key point, disorder is the point here.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Right, disorder is the point. And we necessitate to sort out fact from myth.
Thank you both for helping us do that.
We want to go now to Kansas Democratic Governor Laura Kelly.
Good morning to you, Governor.
GOV. LAURA Kelly (D-KS): Good morning to you.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So, Governor, you are in a pretty exceptional position here. You are a twice elected Democratic administeror of a pretty red state. Democrats have been bleeding help in agricultural America for years. How do Democrats woo back agricultural America?
LAURA KELLY: Well, you fair have to get out there and hear and then produce. You comprehend, it – when you – when you do that, you will see that, you comprehend, while we tag everybody red or blue, the fact of the matter is, here in Kansas, we’re Kansans. And so, you comprehend, if you are a Democrat, but you allot the cherishs of most Kansans, you fair necessitate to get out there, talk with them, get them to comprehend you, you to comprehend them, and then they’ll increase that count on and put it in you to run the state.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, Tim Walz is the first sitting administeror to join a Democratic plivential ticket since Bill Clinton. He runs a pretty blue state, but there seems to be a bet that he can speak to the heartland, that he can speak to agricultural America. Do you leank that’s overstated?
LAURA KELLY: No, not at all. I uncomfervent Tim Walz is the epitome of the midwestrict dad. You comprehend, you could put him at any state fair, on any main street, and certainly in a Friday night football game in agricultural Kansas, and he would fit right in.
I leank we also necessitate to reaccumulate that while Minnesota is a blue state, he recurrented in Congress for 12 years a very red section of Minnesota. So, he comprehend agricultural Minnesota. He comprehend agricultural America. And I leank that’s one of the reasons that he is a huge asset to the Harris-Walz team.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So, your state was one of the first to put the publish of abortion on a state ballot to depart it to the voters to determine. And those voters overwhelmingly refuteed redisconnecteions. So, Democrats frequently push – point to your state as proof of concept that this is a galvanizing publish atraverse party lines. But I establish it engaging in interwatchs that you’ve shelp, you try not to talk about abortion. Are Democrats miscalculating by putting it front and caccess?
LAURA KELLY: No, I don’t leank so. I leank – I didn’t put it front and caccess becaengage it wasn’t an publish that I could reassociate deal with. It was a ballot publish. Those publishs go right around me and on to the ballot and to the people. So, I determined that it was better for me to let the people determine what they wanted to do with that and for me to carry on to intensify on the other publishs where I actuassociate could have an impact, you comprehend, on our infraarrange, on our economic increasement, on our schools.
So – but we can see in other states where administerors have come out very aggressively helping women’s reefficient rights. Michigan, for instance, comes to mind. And it has toiled. You comprehend, they have relocated the necessitatele in Michigan and other states becaengage they have intensifyed on that publish. And whether we want it to be an publish or not, it is. And I leank it will be an publish in the plivential race this year, too.
MARGARET BRENNAN: But I read that you shelp one of the reasons you personassociate tried not to talk about it was not fair procedural, but also becaengage you shelp Democrats are getting drawn in to hot button culture war publishs. And you shelp you don’t want to get dragged into conversations that you don’t want to have. What do you uncomfervent by that?
LAURA KELLY: Well, I don’t want to get unconscious by publishs that get us away from the core publishs of run – that a administeror is reliable for. And – and that is fair what I shelp before. You’ve got – you’ve got to produce certain your schools are funded. You’ve got to produce certain your roads are built. You’ve got to produce certain you’re produceing in your economy. You’ve got to produce certain you’re repairing your child welfare system. We’ve got all sort of other leangs that we necessitate to be intensifyed on. And what I establish, particularly during my campaigns, is that the – my opponents wanted to engage cultural sociassociate polarizing publishs to sidetrack from the authentic publishs becaengage they didn’t have answers for that.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, Governor, it will be engaging to see if you can duplicate your success. And we will track what is happening, not fair in Kansas, but in some of these other gubernatorial races around the country.
We’ll be right back.
(ANNOUNCEMENTS)
MARGARET BRENNAN: We’re joined now by the CEO of Bank of America, Brian Moynihan.
Good to have you here.
BRIAN MOYNIHAN (CEO, Bank of America): It’s fantastic to be here aobtain, Margaret. Good to see you.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Good to see you.
And this is a week where we had a lot of turbulence in the financial tagets and some jitters here. We comprehend that both plivential campaigns in the coming days will summarize their vision for the economy. So, I’m hoping you can charitable of level-set for us. What is the truth of what you are seeing with American users right now?
BRIAN MOYNIHAN: Well, in our user base of 60 million customers spfinishing every week, what you’re seeing is they’re spfinishing at a rate of increaseth of – this year over last year for July and August so far about 3 percent. That is half the rate it was last year at this time. And so the user has sluggished down. They have money in their accounts, but they’re depleting a little bit. They’re engageed. They’re obtaining money. And it – but if you watch at it, they’ve reassociate sluggished down. So, the Fed is in a position, they have to be pimpolitent that they don’t sluggish down too much.
Right now where they are spfinishing at is constant where they’ve spent in ’17, ’18, ’19, the low inflation, more common increaseth economy.
MARGARET BRENNAN: I saw, in one of your Bank of America tells, that – and you fair alluded to this, more price sensitivity, and that savings accounts are being unintelligentinished.
BRIAN MOYNIHAN: Yes.
MARGARET BRENNAN: That would advise people reassociate are not transporting in enough, that they have to go into their – into their savings. Like, is this all fair inflation that’s pressuring?
BRIAN MOYNIHAN: If you watch atraverse branch offent segments of obtainings power, those answers are somewhat branch offent.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Yes.
BRIAN MOYNIHAN: But if you watch at it overall, there’s been a lot of money relocated to instruments that pay higher interest rates out of examineing accounts, they spotlessed up becaengage it went from zero percent interest to five percent interest. And so if you delete that, fundamentalassociate the people who had an account with us in January 2020, before the pandemic, you watch at them now, they’re still sitting with much more – even inflation adfaired, much more in their account. The problem is, it’s begined drifting down, which shows that they’re using that money now to carry on their lifestyle. That’s not that atypical in the summer months, frankly, becaengage of travel and vacations and everyleang.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Right.
BRIAN MOYNIHAN: And where the money is being spent by our users is on those type of experiences. But if you watch wilean it, they’re still going to restaurants and they’re taking travel. But on the other hand, they’re spfinishing a little bit less – they’re going to the food store the same number of times, but spfinishing a little bit less, which uncomfervents they’re fundamentalassociate discovering barobtains and leangs enjoy that. And you’re seeing corporations cut price to react to that. And so it’s the way the economy toils in those – it’s sluggishing down. And that’s where we have to be pimpolitent becaengage we’ve won the war on inflation. It’s come down. It’s not where people want it yet. But we’ve got to be pimpolitent that we don’t try to get so perfect that we actuassociate put us in economic downturn.
But our team is a fantastic team at Bank of America research, does not have any economic downturn predicament anymore. Last year this time it was a economic downturn. This year we talked about, now there’s no economic downturn. And fundamentalassociate they say we go to 2 percent increaseth to 1.5 percent increaseth over the next six quarters and charitable of bump alengthy at that increaseth rate plus or minus 2 (ph) percent (ph).
MARGARET BRENNAN: And they’re betting that in September the Federal Reserve does go ahead with an interest rate cut.
BRIAN MOYNIHAN: Yes, and I leank that’s the – that’s the taget consensus is actuassociate more cuts than our team is. Ours is two this year, September, December, four next year, and a couple next year. But I leank one of the concepts out hear out there a lot, Margaret, is this concept of higher for lengthyer. The truth is, our team, and most people leank we’ll set (ph) them with 3, 3.5 percent Fed Funds Rate, which is much branch offent than the last 15, 17 years people have inhabitd it. So, people who came into the business world, you comprehend, in 2007, 2008 have not seen this charitable of interest rate environment.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Yes.
BRIAN MOYNIHAN: And so we’re getting back to common. And that’s going to get a while for people to adfair to, both on the corporate side, commercial side, and on the user side.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So, I’m not asking you a political ask here. The Federal Reserve is set up by Congress as politicassociate imfragmentary.
BRIAN MOYNIHAN: Yes.
MARGARET BRENNAN: It, you comprehend, has to deal with engagement and stabilizing prices. This past week Donald Trump was asked if, as plivent, he could deal with a gentle landing of the economy with the current Federal Reserve directership in place. Here is how he reacted.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
DONALD TRUMP (R), FORMER U.S. PRESIDENT AND 2024 PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: I experience a plivent should have at least say in there. Yes, I experience that powerwholey. I leank that in my case I’ve made a lot of money. I was very prosperous. And I leank I have a better instinct than, in many cases, people that would be on the Federal Reserve or the chairman.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
MARGARET BRENNAN: The chairman was assigned by Donald Trump, Jerome Powell, and carry ons to serve.
But what he’s talking about now is political directers influencing or overriding economists in setting the Fed Funds Rate, in setting interest rates.
BRIAN MOYNIHAN: I leank it would be –
MARGARET BRENNAN: What would be the implication of that?
BRIAN MOYNIHAN: I leank, if you watch around the world’s economies and you see where fed central banks are self-reliant and function freely, they tfinish to fair better than ones that don’t. And so I leank that that’s charitable of the – the American way. It’s been that way.
Does that stop people from giving the – Chair Powell advice or other people? No. I give him advice, you comprehend. So, we all give him advice. And so I leank you – we’ve got to be pimpolitent. You comprehend, when he goes up and does the Humphrey Hawkins, he gets lots of advice about where rates should go. So, there’s a lot of people that have a watch of it. But their job is to sort thraw it all and say what’s best for the U.S. economy on those two unintelligentensions you talked about and be constant.
I leank right now Brian Moynihan giving advice has got to be more pimpolitent of the downside of not begining moving down rates, to restore a experienceing that, you comprehend, there’s weightless at the finish of the tunnel. They’ve telderly people rates probably aren’t going to go up, but if they don’t begin taking them down relatively soon, you could dispirit the American user.
Once the American user reassociate begins going very adverse, then it’s difficult to get them back. And on the commercial side, the high rate environment is sluggishing down commercial carry on. So, the corporations aren’t using their lines of praise. Middle tagets, minuscule businesses, they’re – they ‘ve gone backwards in their engage of lines of praise. So, why don’t they engage a line of praise? Either there is an opportunity or the cost is high or both. And right now that’s a little bit they’re worried about the future.
So, I leank right now it’s time for them to begin to get the – become a little more accommodative and get off the redisconnecteions and let the leang (INAUDIBLE). So, I’m giving them advice, everybody does, and I leank the mighty central bank has to get all that advice and process it.
MARGARET BRENNAN: It’s not atypical during a political campaign to hear some of the popucatalog ideas, but one leang I’ve heard from Jamie Dimon of JP Morgan, I’ve heard from you at Bank of America, is this trouble of when you sfinish examines to people, as we’ve converseed with J.D. Vance, when you talk about now taxing tips as now both campaigns are doing, that there is still that difficult ask of, how does America deal with the debts and deficits it already has.
BRIAN MOYNIHAN: Right.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Those conversations fair aren’t happening. What does that cost?
BRIAN MOYNIHAN: Well, I leank right now the cost is not that high. I uncomfervent there’s a mathematical cost to it as interest rates go up, the debt carry cost goes up for the federal administerment, fair enjoy it goes up for the user or companies. And so that’s a hurt to the economy becaengage that money could have been engaged for someleang else had they not borrowed so much.
The second ask is, was there more stimulus applied to the Covid publishs than necessitateed.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Right.
BRIAN MOYNIHAN: And the answer is yes by most economists. Multiples. And so that – we’ve got to let that toil its way out of the system. That’s what helped inflation. And it happened on both administration’s watch.
Now, the third ask reassociate is this ask of handling the debt. And at the finish of the day, you comprehend, 15 years or so ago, the Bowles-Simpson comleave oution came out with ways to do it.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Right.
BRIAN MOYNIHAN: There was an idea it will lift taxes. The response to the business community is, if you’re going to lift taxes, for what?
MARGARET BRENNAN: Right.
BRIAN MOYNIHAN: If you’re going to do it to pay down debt, you comprehend, individuals and companies would probably say, I got that. We’ve – we’ve had to wage a war on Covid. We won the war and now we’ve got to relocate it. But we can’t fair lift taxes and stuff that doesn’t reassociate provide for productivity or frankly help deal with the debt.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Yes.
BRIAN MOYNIHAN: And that’s a trouble people have. That will be a political food fight of high order here for the next restrictcessitate months.
MARGARET BRENNAN: And we will definitely be talking about that as we go into 2025 and the expiration of some of those tax policies.
Brian Moynihan, it’s fantastic to have you here.
BRIAN MOYNIHAN: It’s always excellent to be here, Margaret. Thank you.
MARGARET BRENNAN: We’ll be back in a moment.
(ANNOUNCEMENTS)
MARGARET BRENNAN: Tensions are high in the Middle East where stresss of an enbiging regional war are increaseing a week after Israel finished a top Hamas directer in Iran and two Hezbollah directers.
For more we go to reweary General Frank McKenzie, who was the establisher directer of U.S. forces in the Middle East.
Good to have you back.
GEN. FRANK MCKENZIE (Reweary Former Commander United States Central Command): Good to be here, Margaret.
MARGARET BRENNAN: General, we’ve talked a number of times in recent months and the scenario you have flagged is the most troubleing is one it seems we are on the brink of, and that is Lebanese-Hezbollah accessing this struggle potentiassociate in a presentant way. How do you characterize where we are right now?
FRANK MCKENZIE: Margaret, I leank we are hours, maybe days, not weeks away from Lebanese-Hezbollah accessing this fight. And that’s always been the big variable. They are the bigst nonstate military entity in the world. You comprehend, a parasite on Lebanon. But they have tens and tens of thousands of highly accurate rockets and leave outiles and they can dispute Israel in a way that Iran, and the Houthis for that matter, are unable to do so becaengage of their geoexplicit proximity, becaengage of the number of armaments that they have. And that’s – that’s very troubleing. I’ve thought all alengthy the most hazardous turn in events would be if they chose to access its scale.
Now, Hassan Nasrallah, the directer of Lebanese Hezbollah, has got to produce a very strategic decision on this becaengage he will be discleave out to a withering Israeli counter aggression should he pick to access at fantastic scale. And what would fantastic scale be? Don’t comprehend. I would say if he picks to aggression Israeli population caccesss, I would say if he – if presentant casualties are caengaged by a Hezbollah aggression, that will transport the IDF in, back in, with fantastic force. And he recognizes that.
And the last point I’d fair produce is, Hassan Nasrallah and Lebanese Hezbollah are perhaps feebleer in Lebanon now than they’ve been in many years becaengage of the destruction of the economy, the fact that the country is in administermental gridlock, lots of problems in Lebanon that he has to leank about before he picks to fight Israel toe to toe.
MARGARET BRENNAN: And that certainly is someleang the diplomats who are trying to chilly leangs off are very conscious of.
Your successor, CENTCOM Command General Kurilla, was twice in Israel this past week. We comprehend the United States has sent F-22 jets to the region. What do you await the scope of U.S. engagement to be?
FRANK MCKENZIE: I leank we saw a taste of that last April in Iran’s 13 April aggression on Israel, which was not a prosperous aggression and it was not prosperous for disconnectal reasons, one of which was Israeli vience (ph). The second was U.S. helpance and some helpance from other nations in the region. All of those leangs militated to dim and reassociate turn aside the Iranian aggression.
I leank that General Kurilla will probably strive to reproduce those same capabilities, that same approach this time. It will be a presentantly difficulter task, though, aobtain, if Lebanese-Hezbollah picks to access becaengage now you face a multi-axis aggression. Iranian from the east, Lebanese-Hezbollah from the north. I’m certain Hamas will chime in to the restricts of their ability. And the Houthis will come in. So, what will be a presentant test for Israel, we are pledgeted to their defense. I leank that Central Command has done a fantastic job of helping them as they ready for this aggression, which I count on is imminent.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Is imminent. You would await to see U.S. jets in the air there intercepting as they did last time?
FRANK MCKENZIE: I leank we would see the same model that was engaged last time. Now, here’s the leang. The Iranians and Lebanese-Hezbollah have had the opportunity to study that tempprocrastinateed. I’m certain they’ll try to produce some adfairments that will produce it more difficult. On the other hand, we too are an alterive lobtaining organization. So, we’ll be watching at our tactics. And we’ve got very excellent directers that can fight an air battle and it will be an air battle that’s going to be fought and I leank – I leank we can be very prosperous here.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Do you leank the U.S. strategy of trying to intensify in on August 15th and a finish-fire in Gaza should still be the caccesspiece for decreaseing tensions thrawout the region?
FRANK MCKENZIE: Certainly, we should try to get to some post-struggle state in Gaza. That’s an – that’s an objective that necessitates to be there considerless of wantipathyver else is going on in the region.
I’m not certain, though, that the current Iranian efforts aobtainst Israel are honestly rcontent to what’s going on in Gaza. You comprehend, the Iranians, fundamental to Iranian philosophy of life is destruction of the state of Israel. We should get them at their word on this. They’re not actuassociate going to aggression or come into struggle with Israel becaengage of what’s going on in Gaza. Their reasons are the existence of Israel itself. And those transcfinish anyleang going on in Gaza.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sir, before I let you go, August 15th is the anniversary of the Taliban seizing deal with of Afghanistan a restrictcessitate years ago. I wonder what you leank about U.S. security currently.
FRANK MCKENZIE: Well, I leank about it a lot, Margaret. And three years on, our ability to see inside Afghanistan is quite restrictcessitate. The aggressive extremist organizations characterized by ISIS-K and other groups, we count on they’re actuassociate enbiging. They carried out a prosperous aggression in Russia a restrictcessitate months ago. I am troubleed about the increaseth of those organizations, and I’m troubleed about their relative deficiency of our ability to see what they’re doing and act aobtainst them should it show essential to do so. So, I leank we’re in a feebleer state now than we were a year ago or two years ago, and I – I am troubleed about the future.
MARGARET BRENNAN: General, always excellent to talk to you. And we’ll all be on edge, as you shelp, for the coming days.
Thank you.
And thanks to all of us – all of you out there for watching us. Until next week, for FACE THE NATION, I’m Margaret Brennan.
(ANNOUNCEMENTS)
Content and programming Copyright MMXXIV CBS Broadcasting Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Copyright 2024 VIQ Media Transcription, Inc. All materials herein are protected by United States imitateright law and may not be reproduced, allotd, sendted, discarry outed, unveiled or widecast without the prior written perleave oution of VIQ Media Transcription, Inc. You may not alter or delete any tradetag, imitateright or other see from copies of the satisfied.
%20Abstract%20Background%20SOURCE%20Apple.jpg?w=870&resize=870,570&ssl=1 "Best Apple Watch (2024): Which Model Should You Buy?")
